Wednesday, November 3, 2010
The Court allowed a section 87 motion. The evidence in question had been inadvertently disclosed the court held that the inadvertent disclosure did not preclude the Minister from asserting national security privilege and found that there as a basis for the claim and no justification for the appointment of a special advocate
Citation: 
2010 FC 1082
Key Issues: 
Secret evidence, Appointment of special advocate waiver